Link to original article
June 11, 2010
by Steve Dennis
The Provincetown Massachusetts School Committee has passed a new condom policy that will allow both its high school and ELEMENTARY school to pass out condoms to CHILDREN who request them.
The vote was unanimous but it does come with some controversy within the school committee– although not for the reasons you would think. Those who voted for the policy, but voiced some concerns over the policy are upset that the new policy isn’t liberal enough.
Dr. Beth Singer, school superintendent, argued that since there is no age limit on the distribution policy, she wanted to ensure that younger students requesting condoms receive information on their use.
The quote above is what some on the committee have a problem with. Putting aside for a moment– if possible– the entire fact that it is absolutely ludicrous that the school committee voted to pass out condoms to anyone regardless of age, what is even more ludicrous is the fact that the concern raised about this policy was because students are required to see the nurse to get the condoms.
I don’t like that students can’t be discreet about this,” said school committee member Shannon Patrick. “They have to go and ask for it. I’d rather them not have the conversation [with counselors] and have the condom than not have the condom.”
“I can see some kids opting out because of the conversation. I’m not against [the policy]. I’m just trying to put myself in that teenager’s spot
The concerns raised about this policy center around the fact that a child would have to ask a nurse for a condom; the opponents feel that the condoms should be available without a child even having to ask for them. Asking for them will put too much stress on them and scare them away from getting a condom according to these people.
But this story does not end there; it gets even worse. Written into the policy is the statement that the schools will not honor a parent’s request that their child not be given a condom. The school knows better than the parent and the parent has no say in this matter, that is the message that is being sent by the Provincetown School Committee.
The idea that a twelve year old can go to the school nurse and request a condom even after the parents of that twelve year old have told the school that they do not wish their child be given that condom is unbelievable on its own. But when you couple it with the fact that there are school committee members who believe that the twelve year old should just be able to get the condom from a free condom dispenser in the bathroom– or some other means like this– without at least having to learn how to actually use it is astounding to me.
Somehow educating a CHILD before they give that CHILD a condom is wrong in the minds of those that are supposed to be educating our children. Even having a conversation about sex and condoms is wrong according to some members of the Provincetown School Committee; they believe our CHILDREN are better left in the dark as long as they can get their condom, that is the important thing in their mind. But it isn’t surprising considering that the Provincetown School Committee decided it was okay to hand out condoms to CHILDREN in the first place.
_____________________________________________
JMC Ministries Response
Written by Miranda Caverley
Why are they wanting to hand out condoms to children that haven't even hit puberty yet? The reason for a condom is to practice safe sex, to in hope NOT Get Pregnant and NOT get an STD or HIV.
Children in elementary school have not hit puberty and so cannot actually use the condoms. So why do it? In my mind all you will be having is a bunch of little kids running around with these condoms throwing them at each other or going up to complete strangers and saying, "look what my teacher gave me today." (with a wide smile on their face)
Is this what you want your 5-10 year old running around with in their pockets? Then in turn the School is wasting money on giving condoms out to children who REALLY don't know what they are and can't even use them.
Why does Society feel a need to expose children to things that they can't do and really don't even understand? When I was a child I didn't even know what a condom was until I was 15 years old and I am now 29. I also wasn't taught anything about sex or the changes girls go through until I was 11 almost 12. It did me no harm in being taught about the birds and the bees later on. So why do schools feel they have to give these things to little kids?
I also feel that public schools today really are not there to teach today's youth a good education. They are there to push their own agenda and to push whatever "they" think our children should be taught. It's sad you can't hand out a bible to a child in school but you can hand out a condom. Oh how far our country has fallen.
Thursday, June 17, 2010
Ex Porn Star Shelly Lubben Speaks at U.S. Capitol Hill
Ex-Porn Star Speaks at U.S. Capitol to Fight Porn Laws
CNSNews.com
Ex-Porn Star: ‘Porn Destroys Human Lives and is Destroying Our Nation’ Thursday, June 17, 2010
By Nick Dean
(CNSNews.com) - Despite six federal obscenity laws currently on the books, illegal hardcore pornography is running rampant on cable television and the Internet -- and federal prosecutions are virtually nonexistent. That needs to change, says a group of researchers and anti-porn activists.
At a briefing held at the U.S. Capitol, researchers and activists, including a former porn movie actress, highlighted the finding of leading researchers on the harm and long-term effects that hardcore pornography has on its viewers -- especially children -- and called on Congress to make the Justice Department to crack down on those who make and distribute illegal pornography.
“We are asking that the prosecution of obscenity laws, which seems to be on hold in this administration, be given a high priority because of the widespread harm we now know hardcore pornography is causing to America,” Patrick Trueman, the group’s spokesman, said. “They’re not doing much at all. So we are asking them to make it a priority.”
The group, which calls itself the Coalition for the War on Illegal Pornography, is calling on the Obama administration, Congress, and the Justice Department to elevate the enforcement of obscenity laws it says are being ignored.
"Our efforts today are not partisan because the protection of children, violence against women, addiction and sexual trafficking are not partisan issues. Nor are we here today to quarrel with Attorney General Holder," said Trueman, the former chief of the Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section, U.S. Department of Justice.
Trueman said laws already on the books make it illegal to distribute hardcore pornography on the Internet, by satellite or cable television and in sexually-oriented businesses.
“We are not asking for new laws. We have enough laws. What we are asking is that those laws be vigorously enforced,” Trueman said.
Trueman said the Obama administration isn’t alone – the last s have not spent much time or effort enforcing America’s obscenity laws.
“Rather than aggressively enforcing the law, the Justice Department, through the Bush years and the Clinton years before that, has been prosecuting relatively minor producers and distributors and the impact of those prosecutions is very little,” Trueman said.
Still, he said, on those rare occasions when prosecutions have been made, the government has been successful. Trueman attributes that success to the “community standard” that he said has to “come into play.”
“A jury has to decide whether hardcore material is beyond community standards and every community wants to say that their community is better than that material,” Trueman said.
Though the laws make its distribution illegal, there has been plenty of study into what constitutes “obscene material” – and researchers no longer wonder what is obscene and what isn’t.
“Obscenity is graphic material that focuses on sex or sexual violence,” professor Donna Rice Hughes, the president of Enough is Enough and a lead spokeswoman on keeping Internet safety said during the briefing.
“(Obscenity) includes lewd exhibition of the genitals, close ups of graphic sex acts and deviant activities such as group sex, bestiality and excretory functions,” Hughes said.
Hughes said that the laws do not criminalize the “soft-core” pornography found in some movies and on TV for adults, but it is not legal for children.
“For 15 years, kids have been spoon-fed easy access to Internet pornography; right in the privacy of their own homes or through any electronic device,” Hughes said. “Because obscenity laws have not been enforced, illegal adult pornography has flooded and polluted the Internet.”
Hughes said the reach of adult pornography has grown and has extended to “epidemic proportions.”
Research has proven that 40 percent of first-time Internet porn views occur unintentionally while searching the Internet through a search engine. Another 12 percent come from misspelled words in Web site names. The average age when Americans first view pornography is now between 8- and 11-years-old, Hughes said.
Despite the unlawful nature of hardcore pornography, the coalition said obscene material has a severely negative affect on consumers – and on the actresses involved.
‘Porn destroys human lives’
Former porn movie actress Shelly Luben, founder and director of an outreach group to those working in the adult film industry offering a variety of support and a transition out of the industry, said that the adult film industry is a hostile and volatile industry for its performers.
Sixty-six (66) percent of actors within the porn industry contract herpes and 70 percent of the sexually transmitted infections contracted in the industry occur in women, she said.
Luben was a pornography performer for 12 years, during which she contracted herpes, Human Papilloma Virus and battled cervical cancer. She spent eight years recovering from her time in the industry and in 2008 founded the Pink Cross Foundation to minister to others still in the industry.
“I have suffered much at the hands of the porn industry,” Luben said. “Porn destroys human lives and is destroying our nation. And I am proof of that.”
Mary Anne Layden, a psychotherapist and director of education of the Sexual Trauma and Psychopathology Program at the Center for Cognitive Therapy of the University of Pennsylvania has treated several patients suffering from pornography addiction.
“They would watch things being done to women that they would not want done to the women they love. It psychologically destabilizes them to violate their own innate sense of justice, fairness and the golden rule and reduces their own self-respect,” Layden said.
Layden said the American Psychiatric Association has added hypersexual disorder to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) used to diagnose psychiatric and psychological disorders.
“Pornography robs men of their masculinity, of their psychological health, of their self-respect, of their greatness. … It then robs their family, their community and their country of all that they could have offered,” she said.
The group, meanwhile, is asking every member of the House and Senate to sign a letter to be sent to Attorney General Eric Holder asking him to make obscenity cases a priority for the Justice Department.
Other speakers at the briefing were: Dr. Sharon Cooper, a forensic pediatrician; Gail Dines, professor of sociology at Wheelock College in Boston; and Laura Lederer, an attorney and leading voice against human trafficking.
At a briefing held at the U.S. Capitol, researchers and activists, including a former porn movie actress, highlighted the finding of leading researchers on the harm and long-term effects that hardcore pornography has on its viewers -- especially children -- and called on Congress to make the Justice Department to crack down on those who make and distribute illegal pornography.
“We are asking that the prosecution of obscenity laws, which seems to be on hold in this administration, be given a high priority because of the widespread harm we now know hardcore pornography is causing to America,” Patrick Trueman, the group’s spokesman, said. “They’re not doing much at all. So we are asking them to make it a priority.”
The group, which calls itself the Coalition for the War on Illegal Pornography, is calling on the Obama administration, Congress, and the Justice Department to elevate the enforcement of obscenity laws it says are being ignored.
"Our efforts today are not partisan because the protection of children, violence against women, addiction and sexual trafficking are not partisan issues. Nor are we here today to quarrel with Attorney General Holder," said Trueman, the former chief of the Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section, U.S. Department of Justice.
Trueman said laws already on the books make it illegal to distribute hardcore pornography on the Internet, by satellite or cable television and in sexually-oriented businesses.
“We are not asking for new laws. We have enough laws. What we are asking is that those laws be vigorously enforced,” Trueman said.
Trueman said the Obama administration isn’t alone – the last s have not spent much time or effort enforcing America’s obscenity laws.
“Rather than aggressively enforcing the law, the Justice Department, through the Bush years and the Clinton years before that, has been prosecuting relatively minor producers and distributors and the impact of those prosecutions is very little,” Trueman said.
Still, he said, on those rare occasions when prosecutions have been made, the government has been successful. Trueman attributes that success to the “community standard” that he said has to “come into play.”
“A jury has to decide whether hardcore material is beyond community standards and every community wants to say that their community is better than that material,” Trueman said.
Though the laws make its distribution illegal, there has been plenty of study into what constitutes “obscene material” – and researchers no longer wonder what is obscene and what isn’t.
“Obscenity is graphic material that focuses on sex or sexual violence,” professor Donna Rice Hughes, the president of Enough is Enough and a lead spokeswoman on keeping Internet safety said during the briefing.
“(Obscenity) includes lewd exhibition of the genitals, close ups of graphic sex acts and deviant activities such as group sex, bestiality and excretory functions,” Hughes said.
Hughes said that the laws do not criminalize the “soft-core” pornography found in some movies and on TV for adults, but it is not legal for children.
“For 15 years, kids have been spoon-fed easy access to Internet pornography; right in the privacy of their own homes or through any electronic device,” Hughes said. “Because obscenity laws have not been enforced, illegal adult pornography has flooded and polluted the Internet.”
Hughes said the reach of adult pornography has grown and has extended to “epidemic proportions.”
Research has proven that 40 percent of first-time Internet porn views occur unintentionally while searching the Internet through a search engine. Another 12 percent come from misspelled words in Web site names. The average age when Americans first view pornography is now between 8- and 11-years-old, Hughes said.
Despite the unlawful nature of hardcore pornography, the coalition said obscene material has a severely negative affect on consumers – and on the actresses involved.
‘Porn destroys human lives’
Former porn movie actress Shelly Luben, founder and director of an outreach group to those working in the adult film industry offering a variety of support and a transition out of the industry, said that the adult film industry is a hostile and volatile industry for its performers.
Sixty-six (66) percent of actors within the porn industry contract herpes and 70 percent of the sexually transmitted infections contracted in the industry occur in women, she said.
Luben was a pornography performer for 12 years, during which she contracted herpes, Human Papilloma Virus and battled cervical cancer. She spent eight years recovering from her time in the industry and in 2008 founded the Pink Cross Foundation to minister to others still in the industry.
“I have suffered much at the hands of the porn industry,” Luben said. “Porn destroys human lives and is destroying our nation. And I am proof of that.”
Mary Anne Layden, a psychotherapist and director of education of the Sexual Trauma and Psychopathology Program at the Center for Cognitive Therapy of the University of Pennsylvania has treated several patients suffering from pornography addiction.
“They would watch things being done to women that they would not want done to the women they love. It psychologically destabilizes them to violate their own innate sense of justice, fairness and the golden rule and reduces their own self-respect,” Layden said.
Layden said the American Psychiatric Association has added hypersexual disorder to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) used to diagnose psychiatric and psychological disorders.
“Pornography robs men of their masculinity, of their psychological health, of their self-respect, of their greatness. … It then robs their family, their community and their country of all that they could have offered,” she said.
The group, meanwhile, is asking every member of the House and Senate to sign a letter to be sent to Attorney General Eric Holder asking him to make obscenity cases a priority for the Justice Department.
Other speakers at the briefing were: Dr. Sharon Cooper, a forensic pediatrician; Gail Dines, professor of sociology at Wheelock College in Boston; and Laura Lederer, an attorney and leading voice against human trafficking.
Bible ban Lifted from Boston Community Center
No longer banned in Boston: Church allowed to put Bible back into vacation Bible school
ADF letter prompts city community center to change unconstitutional meeting room policy banning religious contentTuesday, June 15, 2010, 12:00 AM (MST) |
ADF Media Relations | 480-444-0020
Link to original article from ADF
| |||
BOSTON — The Boston Centers for Youth and Families has notified Alliance Defense Fund attorneys that it will put an end to its problematic policy banning the use of religious content in its publicly available meeting rooms.
The city agency made its decision after receiving a letter from ADF on behalf of Calvary Chapel of the City, which has reserved space for its weekly after-school “Calvary Kidz” program, as well as an upcoming vacation Bible school. After providing biblical instruction to children for more than two years at the city’s Thomas L. Johnson Community Center, the program was told that the center’s policy no longer allowed religious teaching in its rooms that are open to the rest of the general public.
“Christian groups shouldn’t be discriminated against for their religious beliefs at facilities open to the public,” said ADF Senior Legal Counsel Joel Oster. “The city has done the right thing in agreeing to no longer enforce its unconstitutional policy so that Christian groups can enjoy the same access that has been freely offered to everyone else.”
Since January 2008, Calvary Chapel in the City has used a meeting room every Friday afternoon at the community center to teach character development and virtues from a biblical perspective through lessons, games, and other activities to children between the ages of 5 and 12.
Even though the Johnson Center--like other facilities under the oversight of the Boston Centers for Youth and Families--is available to various outside organizations and out-of-school programming, an official of the center notified the director of Calvary Kidz that the church’s program at the center can no longer include religious content. The director was told that Boston Centers imposes this “city policy” for all events at the center, as it stated that groups “cannot teach religion inside of a community center.” Calvary Kidz complied and withheld religious content from its meetings for weeks until the situation could be resolved.
“The training and materials provided by ADF proved very helpful in this case,” said Philip Moran, one of more than 1,600 attorneys in the ADF alliance, who is serving as local counsel in the matter. “Being in a position to simply cite the relevant case law helped us assist the attorneys for the city of Boston to realize that the city’s position was untenable and saved everyone the time and expense of a lawsuit.”
On June 7, ADF attorneys sent letters to 151 government entities to end religious discrimination policies at more than 750 government-run facilities across the nation.
ADF is a legal alliance of Christian attorneys and like-minded organizations defending the right of people to freely live out their faith. Launched in 1994, ADF employs a unique combination of strategy, training, funding, and litigation to protect and preserve religious liberty, the sanctity of life, marriage, and the family.
The city agency made its decision after receiving a letter from ADF on behalf of Calvary Chapel of the City, which has reserved space for its weekly after-school “Calvary Kidz” program, as well as an upcoming vacation Bible school. After providing biblical instruction to children for more than two years at the city’s Thomas L. Johnson Community Center, the program was told that the center’s policy no longer allowed religious teaching in its rooms that are open to the rest of the general public.
“Christian groups shouldn’t be discriminated against for their religious beliefs at facilities open to the public,” said ADF Senior Legal Counsel Joel Oster. “The city has done the right thing in agreeing to no longer enforce its unconstitutional policy so that Christian groups can enjoy the same access that has been freely offered to everyone else.”
Since January 2008, Calvary Chapel in the City has used a meeting room every Friday afternoon at the community center to teach character development and virtues from a biblical perspective through lessons, games, and other activities to children between the ages of 5 and 12.
Even though the Johnson Center--like other facilities under the oversight of the Boston Centers for Youth and Families--is available to various outside organizations and out-of-school programming, an official of the center notified the director of Calvary Kidz that the church’s program at the center can no longer include religious content. The director was told that Boston Centers imposes this “city policy” for all events at the center, as it stated that groups “cannot teach religion inside of a community center.” Calvary Kidz complied and withheld religious content from its meetings for weeks until the situation could be resolved.
“The training and materials provided by ADF proved very helpful in this case,” said Philip Moran, one of more than 1,600 attorneys in the ADF alliance, who is serving as local counsel in the matter. “Being in a position to simply cite the relevant case law helped us assist the attorneys for the city of Boston to realize that the city’s position was untenable and saved everyone the time and expense of a lawsuit.”
On June 7, ADF attorneys sent letters to 151 government entities to end religious discrimination policies at more than 750 government-run facilities across the nation.
- Pronunciation guide: Oster (Oh-stir), Moran (More-ann)
ADF is a legal alliance of Christian attorneys and like-minded organizations defending the right of people to freely live out their faith. Launched in 1994, ADF employs a unique combination of strategy, training, funding, and litigation to protect and preserve religious liberty, the sanctity of life, marriage, and the family.
www.telladf.org facebook.com/AllianceDefenseFund twitter.com/AllianceDefense
Bible Outlawed in Idaho Now in Court
ADF files appeal over Western Civilization book ban in Idaho public schools, universities
Commission bans use of any texts it deems ‘religious,' even if used solely for objective literary or historical reference
Monday, June 14, 2010, 12:00 AM (MST) |
ADF Media Relations | 480-444-0020 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting 480-444-0020 end_of_the_skype_highlighting
Link to original article from Alliance Defense Fund
BOISE, Idaho — Alliance Defense Fund attorneys filed an appeal Monday with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit, contesting a federal judge’s decision to dismiss a lawsuit that challenges the Idaho Public Charter School Commission’s across-the-board ban on the use of texts and documents deemed to be “religious.” ADF attorneys filed the lawsuit on behalf of Nampa Classical Academy last November after the commission threatened to revoke the academy’s charter if it used the Bible or other religious texts on its classroom resource list for any purpose whatsoever.
“Censoring classical books, including religious books, does not improve a student’s education; it harms it,” said ADF Senior Legal Counsel David Cortman. “A wholesale ban on books with religious content conflicts with established U.S. Supreme Court precedent stating that even ‘the Bible may constitutionally be used in an appropriate study of history, civilization, ethics, comparative religion, or the like.’ Nampa Classical Academy offered just this sort of complete education, which is what any child deserves.”
Cortman said that if the commission’s misinterpretation of the law is allowed to stand, all Idaho public school and university students will be subject to the ban. He explained that, contrary to the conclusion of last month’s ruling from the court, the local school district--not the charter school commission--is the entity allowed by law to make the ultimate determination on how to implement the state’s curriculum standards.
“And the curriculum it chose, in this case, is fully within what the U.S. Supreme Court has stated is acceptable and constitutional,” Cortman said. “On these grounds alone, we trust the decision will be reversed on appeal.”
After being in the development process for more than six years, Nampa Classical Academy recently completed its first year of instruction with more than 500 students. It received approval from the State Board of Education in 2008 and received positive responses from the commission at each stage of its development. Last year, however, the commission voted to prohibit the academy from using any “religious documents and text” in its curriculum or in its classroom, even if used objectively as a curriculum resource.
“Nampa Classical Academy is endeavoring to exercise its right to provide the best possible education for its students and has decided to include the Bible--along with dozens of other religious and secular writings--as resources in its curriculum to enrich instruction of literature, history, and culture, among other topics,” Cortman explained. “Schools have been doing this throughout American history.”
Attorney Bruce Skaug of Nampa is serving as local counsel in the lawsuit, Nampa Classical Academy v. Goesling, filed with the U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho.
ADF is a legal alliance of Christian attorneys and like-minded organizations defending the right of people to freely live out their faith. Launched in 1994, ADF employs a unique combination of strategy, training, funding, and litigation to protect and preserve religious liberty, the sanctity of life, marriage, and the family.
www.telladf.org facebook.com/AllianceDefenseFund twitter.com/AllianceDefense
Commission bans use of any texts it deems ‘religious,' even if used solely for objective literary or historical reference
Monday, June 14, 2010, 12:00 AM (MST) |
ADF Media Relations | 480-444-0020 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting 480-444-0020 end_of_the_skype_highlighting
Link to original article from Alliance Defense Fund
BOISE, Idaho — Alliance Defense Fund attorneys filed an appeal Monday with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit, contesting a federal judge’s decision to dismiss a lawsuit that challenges the Idaho Public Charter School Commission’s across-the-board ban on the use of texts and documents deemed to be “religious.” ADF attorneys filed the lawsuit on behalf of Nampa Classical Academy last November after the commission threatened to revoke the academy’s charter if it used the Bible or other religious texts on its classroom resource list for any purpose whatsoever.
“Censoring classical books, including religious books, does not improve a student’s education; it harms it,” said ADF Senior Legal Counsel David Cortman. “A wholesale ban on books with religious content conflicts with established U.S. Supreme Court precedent stating that even ‘the Bible may constitutionally be used in an appropriate study of history, civilization, ethics, comparative religion, or the like.’ Nampa Classical Academy offered just this sort of complete education, which is what any child deserves.”
Cortman said that if the commission’s misinterpretation of the law is allowed to stand, all Idaho public school and university students will be subject to the ban. He explained that, contrary to the conclusion of last month’s ruling from the court, the local school district--not the charter school commission--is the entity allowed by law to make the ultimate determination on how to implement the state’s curriculum standards.
“And the curriculum it chose, in this case, is fully within what the U.S. Supreme Court has stated is acceptable and constitutional,” Cortman said. “On these grounds alone, we trust the decision will be reversed on appeal.”
After being in the development process for more than six years, Nampa Classical Academy recently completed its first year of instruction with more than 500 students. It received approval from the State Board of Education in 2008 and received positive responses from the commission at each stage of its development. Last year, however, the commission voted to prohibit the academy from using any “religious documents and text” in its curriculum or in its classroom, even if used objectively as a curriculum resource.
“Nampa Classical Academy is endeavoring to exercise its right to provide the best possible education for its students and has decided to include the Bible--along with dozens of other religious and secular writings--as resources in its curriculum to enrich instruction of literature, history, and culture, among other topics,” Cortman explained. “Schools have been doing this throughout American history.”
Attorney Bruce Skaug of Nampa is serving as local counsel in the lawsuit, Nampa Classical Academy v. Goesling, filed with the U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho.
ADF is a legal alliance of Christian attorneys and like-minded organizations defending the right of people to freely live out their faith. Launched in 1994, ADF employs a unique combination of strategy, training, funding, and litigation to protect and preserve religious liberty, the sanctity of life, marriage, and the family.
www.telladf.org facebook.com/AllianceDefenseFund twitter.com/AllianceDefense
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)