During almost 500 meetings I set up to raise support for service in
Germany, I glimpsed a snapshot of current evangelical sentiment towards
long-term, cross-cultural ministry. Many exciting things are happening
today in the evangelical world, whether in short-term ministry, church
planting, or expanding our social consciousness. Yet I cannot escape the
conclusion that a major change in the tides has come to the evangelical
world regarding missions. Time and time again I encountered intelligent
people, both laymen and pastors, who argued passionately that
long-term, cross-cultural work is "no longer the way God does things."
The arguments have come from many corners, but regardless of the
source, the next generation of long-term, cross-cultural missionaries
seems to be listening. I regularly hear about people who have been, in
essence, reasoned out of their calling. Anyone who cares about God's
mission to the nations should be interested to address the ideas being
used to deconstruct 20 centuries of missionary precedent. So let me
briefly introduce the most popular objections and offer an alternative
way of looking at each of them.
- "It (long-term, cross-cultural missions) destroys foreign cultures."
In contrast to the way that American capitalism, franchising, and
media encourage people to wear the same things, watch the same shows,
and worship the same cultural idols, Christian missionaries
have historically been at the vanguard of linguistics, studying local
culture, and contextualizing the faith in a truly native way. Like any
other branch of Christian ministry, international missions work has
endured embarrassing and lamentable chapters. But in many cases
Christian missionaries are some of the few people interested in
preserving a language, even a whole culture, in the midst of the
homogenizing effect of globalization.
- "It's based on outdated theology."
If missions no longer concerns us, we must think (at one level or
another) the gospel itself is no longer necessary or urgent. But to the
extent that we think the spread of the gospel is no longer necessary or
urgent, we are no longer truly Christians.
- "It's unnecessarily offensive."
The Prince of Peace himself offended people when he preached the
gospel. Of course, Christians sometimes offend others by sheer rudeness,
and where that happens it should be rebuked. But if your version of
Christianity does not offend your non-believing friends, even when
articulated civilly and sensibly, you have good reason to ask whether
it's really Christianity you're explaining.
- "Short-term teams can do the same thing but more efficiently."
In every other field of human endeavor---whether medicine,
accounting, or teaching---we think a person needs education and
experience to do their job well. But it is increasingly popular to
assume that everyone---no matter their commitment, education, or
experience---can do equally well in explaining the gospel to people of a
different culture. This is a kind of insult to the unevangelized. This
view testifies to our belief that people outside our neighborhood or
borders are somehow less sophisticated, or more easily appealed to, than
we would be. Real work takes real time, and real people deserve our
long-term attention.
READ MORE